Plan Change 1: Natural Hazards

Natural hazards overview

We’re reviewing the rules around development in natural hazard-prone areas as part of our regular reviews of the District Plan.

In 2022, we sought your feedback on an early version of these changes. We formally consulted on the changes having responded to the feedback received. 

In May 2023 Plan Change 1 was formally notified and a hearing was held in February 2024.  Independent Hearing Commissioners were appointed to hear submissions.  

The hearings commissioners have made their recommendation on submissions and these recommendations have been adopted by Council. Plan change 1 is now at Decision Version stage and has legal effect.

To see the most up to date information on this plan change, please click on the sections above.

What changes are being proposed?

The proposed Natural Hazards rules are designed to reduce the risk to people and property from development in areas at risk of natural hazards.

Decision Version Natural Hazards Chapter(PDF, 681KB)

What does this mean for my property?

The new rules will not affect existing buildings or property, unless you plan to make changes to them.

As of 4 December 2024 the rules in Plan Change 1 have legal effect because decisions have been made on submissions. 

If you are proposing to make changes to your property, then you must consider the Plan Change 1 rules alongside the Operative District Plan rules.   New development will need to comply with both sets of rules or apply for resource consent. 

The appeal period is now open. The operative rules will need to be considered alongside the Plan Change 1 rules until appeals have closed because the provisions could still be subject to some changes.

Key dates

Any resource consent applications lodged on or after 31 May 2023 will need to have regard to the proposed objectives and policies of Plan Change 1.

Any applications lodged on or after 4 December 2024 will need to be assessed against the Decision Version Plan Change 1 rules as well as the Operative District Plan.

Natural hazard maps

You can see if a natural hazard is mapped on your property in the District Plan.

  1. Open the Decision natural hazard maps in GIS (wdc.maps.arcgis.com)
  2. Search icon with magnifying glass in the middle. Look for the magnifying glass icon. Type your property address into the search bar.
  3. Legend icon with a list in the middle. To see what the different colours on the map means, you can view the legend by clicking the legend icon.
  4. Layers icon with a stack of square items in the middle. To turn some parts of the map on or off, select the layers icon and then toggle each layer on Layer On icon which shows an open eye. or off Layer Off icon which shows a line through an open eye. .

More information on the natural hazard types that are identified on the Plan Change 1 District Plan maps can be found below.  

Coastal erosion and coastal flooding

Coastal erosion happens when land is worn away (suddenly or over time) by coastal processes such as waves, tidal currents and storm events.

Coastal flooding happens when low-lying areas become submerged under sea water, often due to storm surges generated by large storms.

Coastal hazard reports

The Northland Regional Council holds the most recent reports relating to coastal hazards:

Coastal hazard assessment reports (nrc.govt.nz)

These coastal hazards reports have informed the mapping that is proposed to be included in the Natural Hazards plan change.

Land instability

Land instability hazards, or landslides, result from factors such as:

  • heavy rainfall,
  • excessive weight,
  • excavation,
  • vegetation clearance,
  • natural weathering,
  • and erosion.

Land instability reports

The following technical reports relate to the mapped instability hazards.  

Urban Land Stability Hazards for Te Kamo, Maunu, Onerahi, Otaika and Tikipunga(PDF, 386KB)

Urban Land Stability Hazards for Hikurangi, mid-Kensington, Whangarei City Centre and East Te Kamo(PDF, 836KB)

Urban Land Stability Hazards for Kensington, Morningside and Port(PDF, 203KB)

Coastal Slope Instability Hazards for Ōakura to Langs Beach(PDF, 549KB)

Landslide Susceptibility Technical Report 2020(PDF, 8MB)

Flooding

Flooding is caused by high-intensity rain causing run-off, the overflowing of streams and rivers, or a combination of the two.

River flood hazard reports

The Northland Regional Council holds the most recent reports relating to river flooding.

Region-wide river catchments analysis - technical reports (nrc.govt.nz)

These reports have informed the mapping that is proposed to be included in the Natural Hazards plan change.

Mining subsidence hazards

Coal mining was a major industry in Te Kamo and Hikurangi. Residential land developed above the mines has become at risk of ground subsidence over time.

Mining subsidence reports

The following technical reports relate to the mining subsidence maps.

Mine Subsidence Hazard - Hikurangi Area(PDF, 242KB)

Mine Subsidence Hazard - Te Kamo Area (2013)(PDF, 2MB)

Mine Subsidence Hazard - Te Kamo Area (2005)(PDF, 307KB)

Kamo Mine Zones Map (March 2005)(PDF, 1MB)

Notification and submissions

The following documents in this section contain information on the plan change notification and submissions. 

Submissions

Hearings

Hearing was held at 9:00am on Monday 19 February 2024 at Whangarei District Council, Te Iwitahi, 9 Rust Avenue, Whangārei.

The following documents contain information on the Natural Hazards Hearing.

Council hearing documents

Hearing agenda(PDF, 278KB)

Section 42A Errata report(PDF, 342KB)

Council opening statement (Robert Burgoyne)(PDF, 236KB)

Memo to Hearing Panel - Proposed mapping review methodology and timeframes (post-hearing)(PDF, 160KB)

Memo to Hearing Panel - April 2024 update on Right of Reply progress (post-hearing)(PDF, 314KB)

Memo to Hearing Panel - May 2024 update on Right of Reply progress (post-hearing)(PDF, 104KB)

Memo to the Hearing Panel - June 2024 update on Right of Reply progress (post-hearing)(PDF, 104KB)

Section 42A Hearing report

Section 42A Hearing report(PDF, 2MB)

Attachments

Attachment 1:  Section 42A recommended Plan Change 1 provisions (track changed version)(PDF, 791KB)

Attachment 2:  Section 42A recommended Plan Change 1 provisions (clean version)(PDF, 661KB)

Attachment 3:  Section 42A recommended Plan Change 1 planning maps: 

Attachment 4:  Tonkin + Taylor review of Site Specific submissions on Flood Hazard maps(PDF, 7MB)

Attachment 5:  Tonkin + Taylor review of Site Specific submissions on Coastal Hazard maps(PDF, 2MB)

Attachment 6:  Tonkin + Taylor review of Site Specific submissions on Instability Hazard maps:

T+T Supplementary Hearing statement - overview for attachments 3 - 6 of Section 42A report(PDF, 667KB)

Hearing evidence

Pre-circulated evidence 

Pre-circulated legal submissions - Northpower(PDF, 248KB)

Evidence to be tabled - Golden Bay Cement(PDF, 874KB)

Evidence to be tabled - Liam Watson(PDF, 2MB)

Evidence to be tabled - The Fuel Companies(PDF, 227KB)

Evidence to be tabled - Transpower(PDF, 445KB)

Evidence to be tabled - Greg Bracey(PDF, 618KB)

Evidence to be tabled - Gary Martin(PDF, 4MB)

Evidence to be tabled - Woolworths(PDF, 2MB)

Evidence to be tabled - Ministry of Education(PDF, 216KB)

Evidence to be tabled - Whangarei District Council Infrastructure(PDF, 290KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited(PDF, 267KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - David and Jane Garrick(PDF, 5MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Fire and Emergency New Zealand(PDF, 285KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Fonterra Limited (Graeme Mathieson)(PDF, 413KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Fonterra Limited (Suzanne O'Rourke)(PDF, 225KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Foodstuffs North Island (David Badham)(PDF, 1MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Foodstuffs North Island (Jonathan Williamson)(PDF, 5MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Fred Morgan(PDF, 2MB) 

Pre-circulated evidence - Hika Limited, Jackson Hikurangi, Mouresses Trust No.2, Quality Developments, DC Group, Otaika Valley Free Range Eggs Ltd and Commercial Centres(PDF, 9MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - HKRS Holdings Ltd(PDF, 2MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Kāinga Ora (Brendon Ligget)(PDF, 224KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Kāinga Ora (David Badham)(PDF, 3MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Marsden Cove Limited (James Greenwood)(PDF, 6MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Marsden Cove Limited (Kaaren Joubert)(PDF, 6MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Marsden Cove Limited (Gray Hopper)(PDF, 113KB)

Pre Ciculated Evidence - Metlifecare Retirement Villages Limited (David Badham)(PDF, 2MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Metlifecare Retirement Villages Limited (Matthew Packard)(PDF, 12MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi(PDF, 275KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Northland Regional Council(PDF, 407KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Northpower (Brett Hood)(PDF, 839KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Northpower (Michael Gibbs)(PDF, 161KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Northpower (Shaun Brown)(PDF, 2MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Onoke Heights Limited, Hurupaki Holdings Limited, TMB Limited and Totara Estate Developments Limited Partnerships (Aaron Holland)(PDF, 2MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Onoke Heights Limited, Hurupaki Holdings Limited, TMB Limited and Totara Estate Developments Limited Partnerships (Melissa McGrath)(PDF, 22MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Peter Topzand(PDF, 3MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Regeneration Holdings (Callum Sands)(PDF, 21MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Regeneration Holdings (Emma Miller)(PDF, 19MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Te Whatu Ora (Jefferey Garnham - Ngā Tai Ora Public Health)(PDF, 286KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Te Whatu Ora (Melissa McGrath)(PDF, 3MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Telecommunications Companies (Chris Horne)(PDF, 180KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Telecommunications Companies (Joint Statement of Evidence)(PDF, 2MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - The University of Auckland (David Badham)(PDF, 2MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - The University of Auckland (David Ouwejan)(PDF, 12MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Clyde Stevens(PDF, 3MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Campbell Challenger Family Trust(PDF, 11MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - John Glenie(PDF, 584KB)

Pre-circulated evidence - Marian and Leonard Dissanayake(PDF, 8MB)

Pre-circulated evidence - John Calder(PDF, 2MB)

Tabled evidence

Tabled evidence - T and D Baxter(PDF, 33MB)

Tabled evidence - Channel Infrastructure (Riann Elliot)(PDF, 64MB)

Tabled evidence - Channel Infrastructure (Teresa Calmeyer)(PDF, 87KB)

Tabled legal submissions - Channel Infrastructure (Ebony Ellis)(PDF, 842KB)

Tabled submitter joint witness statement – Planning – Permitted Activity Rule framework (Brett Hood, Emma Miller, Melissa McGrath, and David Badham)(PDF, 2MB)

Tabled evidence - New Zealand Transport Agency (Cath Heppelthwaite)(PDF, 110KB)

Tabled evidence - Steedman(PDF, 2MB)

Tabled evidence - M Aylward(PDF, 643KB)

Tabled evidence - Derek Slatter(PDF, 35MB)

Tabled evidence - Marian and Leonard Dissanayake(PDF, 1MB)

Tabled evidence - HKRS Holdings Ltd(PDF, 3MB)

Tabled evidence - Max Haag(PDF, 4MB)

Tabled evidence - John Schwartfeger (late)(PDF, 5MB)

Supporting information

Supporting information – Planning – Permitted Activity Rule framework (Brett Hood, Emma Miller, Melissa McGrath and David Badham)(PDF, 688KB)

Supporting information – Kāinga Ora(PDF, 1MB)

Supporting information – Metlifecare Retirement Villages Limited(PDF, 2MB)

Supporting information – The University of Auckland(PDF, 1MB)

Supporting information – Foodstuffs(PDF, 2MB)

Supporting information - Marian and Leonard Dissanayake(PDF, 1MB)

Post-hearing evidence

Joint Witness Statement - Planning - Permitted Activity Rule Framework (David Badham, Robert Burgoyne, Natalie Dey, Brett Hood, Melissa McGrath, Emma Miller and Vita Strohush)(PDF, 763KB)

Memo of Counsel on behalf of Channel Infrastructure(PDF, 307KB)

Channel Infrastructures response to Hearing Panels Direction (9 August 2024)(PDF, 186KB)

Joint Witness Statement - Planning Permitted Activity Rule Framework (David Badham, Robert Burgoyne, Brett Hood, Melissa McGrath, Emma Miller, and Vita Strohush) 27 August 2024(PDF, 666KB)

Decision

The following documents contain information on the recommendations from the Hearing Panel, the Decision version of Plan Change 1 Provisions, Council’s decision and how to lodge an appeal with the Environment Court.

Recommendations from the Hearing Panel

Decision Version Plan Change 1 Provisions

As of 4 December 2024, the rules in Plan Change 1 have legal effect.  Plan Change 1 rules must be considered alongside the Operative District Plan rules. 

Decision Version - Plan Change 1 Provisions(PDF, 681KB)

Decision Version - Plan Change 1 Maps(PDF, 78MB)

Decision Version - Plan Change 1 GIS maps  (wdc.maps.arcgis.com)

Council's Decision and Appeal information

Council's Decision

Council's Decision - 21 November 2024(PDF, 156KB)

Public notice(PDF, 89KB)

Clause 16(2) Memorandum - Plan Change 1 Decision Version Maps(PDF, 110MB)

Appeal information

The Appeals process is handled by the Environment Court. The below document provides information and links on how to lodge an appeal.

Appeal information and submitters mailing list(PDF, 376KB)  

Frequently asked questions

What is a District Plan?

Whangārei’s District Plan sets out how land in the District can be used, developed and subdivided.

It includes objectives, policies and methods to achieve the sustainable management of resources within the Whangārei District.

Why is a Natural Hazards chapter needed?

Natural hazards can result in damage to property, buildings, and even loss of life. Identifying and managing potential risk areas can reduce the possibility of damage and harm.

Under the Resource Management Act 1991 the management of significant risks from natural hazards is a matter of national importance that needs to be addressed in the District Plan.

It is also a requirement of the Northland Regional Policy Statement to introduce hazards mapping for coastal erosion, coastal flooding and river flooding.

The changes we are proposing to make incorporate the most up to date hazard information and give effect to national and regional guidance.

How do these proposed changes affect me?

The plan change has legal effect because it has progressed through the formal submissions process and has been adopted by Council.

The plan change is now at Decision Version stage which means that if you are proposing to make changes to your property, then you must consider the Plan Change 1 rules alongside the Operative District Plan rules. 

The appeal period is now open. The Operative rules will need to be considered alongside the Plan Change 1 rules until appeals have closed because the provisions could still be subject to some changes. 

The proposed plan change has been developed with a risk-based approach to the management of natural hazards. The rules proposed are triggered when new subdivision and development occurs in mapped natural hazard overlays shown on proposed Planning Maps.

The mapped hazard overlays indicate locations where there is potential for a natural hazard to occur. When the proposed rules are triggered, a site-specific assessment to understand the nature and extent of the identified hazard risk and any necessary mitigation is required.

The proposed changes would only apply to new projects. If your building complies with the requirements that were in place when it was built, and you are not proposing to change it, then you won’t need to do anything.

Hazard mapping is already included on Land Information Memoranda reports, independent of this proposed plan change. If your property is affected by the hazard mapping, any new Land Information Memoranda report for your property will already contain a note to indicate the potential hazard susceptibility. The note will also identify the latest technical information held by us.

It is a legal requirement for us to include all the relevant natural hazard information we hold about a property in a Land Information Memoranda.

How has climate change been factored into this plan change?

It is recognised that climate change will lead to a rise in sea level over time affecting coastal processes, and flooding in coastal areas and further inland.

Climate change projections have been used within flood modelling to include an allowance for sea level rise and changing rainfall as a result of ongoing climate change.

Will this impact my insurance?

Insurers gather their own information when making assessments. They already hold information on how much risk properties carry, including from natural hazards such as flooding and landslips, whether we map them in our District Plan or not.

The modelling in the proposed maps establishes risk profiles for the next 50 to 100 years for flooding and coastal hazards.

The Insurance Council of New Zealand has indicated that in most cases this will not have an immediate effect for property owners on the availability of insurance or its affordability as the changes are likely to occur over a long period of time.

However, you should contact your private insurer directly if you have any questions about insurance.